• Random Moments of Life
  • Relationships
  • poetry or something of the sort.
  • UNFCCC
  • Uncategorized
  • Fiction
  • Guest Bloggers

Vositha's Blog

~ a story of life, love and other things

Vositha's Blog

Category Archives: current updates

What Happens to Animals or their Rights in Sri Lanka?

02 Monday Feb 2015

Posted by vositha in current updates, Features

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

animal rights, legal reforms in Sri Lanka, protecting animals, Sri Lanka

(C) Creative Commons

(C) Creative Commons

Today I was woken up to the howling of a poor puppy who the neighbour had decided to adopt by picking it off the street. The animal was probably days old and the mother of the puppy having spent a day walking around the wall as its pup howled trying to find its mother from a cage he was unfamiliar had decided to lie on the road helpless, with no custodial rights over its pup (now that would unimaginable, a dog to have rights?) while the whole neighbourhood listened to the crying which went over night, and then to the morning as well.

Many assumed that the poor animal was locked up and the wonderful neighbour had gone out for a walk. But on giving them a call I find that they were in the house, and was quite courteous enough to rudely hang up the phone on me. I try to dig out my law books to find out where the animal rights would be protected in this country, though not very hopeful having read a bit on it last night and realised that it most likely would not be much of help. And as usual like many other things in this land the direction is clear: treating animals humanely seems to be something that needs to be added to the country’s list of “to-dos” though we claim we are a very compassionate land where we treat everyone with dignity (everyone not every being of course, which excludes animals).

Me being the not going to courts lawyer, I call up a friend who works for the Attorney General’s and ask him what might be the best move in this situation to ensure that the poor animal be released from this suffering. He advises me to file a complaint on nuisance. His theory being: the police would have to come and check on it, and if the animal is being a nuisance with its howling, then the howling would be stopped. Though my expectation was not to prove that the dog was a nuisance, (rather that my neighbours were inhuman) I realise that most of us in our legal education had skipped studying the section on animal protection in detail.

I started writing an article with the law and its efficiency on not addressing this issue, but then on reading a bit more realise that it is not necessarily the nonexistence of the law that prevents animals from being protected, but the oblivion of its implementation. To do justice to the cause, I think I will be writing a bit on animals and their rights in the coming days, that too with a bit more legal analysis than this article would have carried had I just typed it out from my few hours of reading last night.

My next few days (be it in this land, in transit or some other land) will be about getting a few people together who might be interested in this topic, if you are reading this and are a person who had done a bit of thinking on animal rights protection and legal reform, do drop a comment. Your opinions are most welcome, (constructive ones of course).

PS. I am not a tree hugger, nor an animal hugger. But I do believe that animals are not in the world to carry humans, and be tormented for insecurities and psychopathic disorders that humans possess (this would bring me to write on another issue which is on mental health which would be for a different blog post I think).

Case of Raif Badawi & Flogging in Modern Day World

01 Sunday Feb 2015

Posted by vositha in current updates, Features

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

criminal law, Flogging, International Law, Jus Cogens, Raif Badawi, Saudi Arabia, Sri Lanka

by Vositha Wijenayake and Vidya Nathaniel

Punishing by flogging has come to the forefront of legal and political discussions due to the attention brought to it through the case of Raif Badawi, a Saudi Arabian blogger sentenced to ten years and 1000 lashes for setting up a blog by the name of Saudi Free Liberals Forum which promoted free speech on religion and governance. While world calls for freedom of speech for journalists following the Charlie Hebdo attack in Paris, the conduct of the Saudi government on flogging Badawi has created  a lot of criticism. However the country is not alone in its practice of flogging as a judicial sanction. Other countries such as Singapore, Malaysia, Nigeria, Iran, Maldives, Qatar, Brunei and Indonesia also practice flogging, though it is seen as a form of torture, and a violation of international law.

International Law on Flogging/Flagellation

The terms ‘flogging’ or ‘flagellation’ is not explicitly referred to in the international legislations. However the interpretation of torture provided through many international legislations succeed in bringing it within the acts that are violations of international law. Among these legislations are the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of which Article 5 states, “No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment,” as well as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Article 7 which provides, “No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”.

Prohibition against Torture is well established under customary international law as jus cogens which in turn make it supersede all other treaties and customary law.  Jus cogens are a body of peremptory principles or norms from which no derogation is permitted; those norms recognised by the international community as a whole as being fundamental to the maintenance of an international legal order. Elementary rules that concern the safeguarding of peace and notable those that prohibit recourse to force or the threat of force. Norms of a humanitarian nature are included, such as prohibition against genocide, slavery and racial discrimination. Jus Cogens may therefore operate to invalidate a treaty or agreement between states to the extent of the inconsistency with any such principles or norms.

Convention Against Torture

September 27, 1997 Saudi Arabia acceded to the Convention against Torture or Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (Convention against Torture). Article 1 (1)  of this Convention defines torture to be “any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity.” However the same section provides that torture does not “include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to lawful sanctions.” It is this aspect of the interpretation which is leaves a grey area on how the grievance of victims of state administered torture will be addressed.

Flogging can be easily brought under the definition of torture, as it does cause “severe pain” as well as “suffering”. Badawi is punished for an act he is claimed to have committed. It is also clear that the punishment to be executed in public in front of many on lookers is a form of “intimidating” any other who seeks to challenge the same grounds that Badawi challenged through his blog. Yet the imposing of flogging on Badawi has been done through the judicial system of Saudi Arabia, and as a sanction imposed by the court. Would this in turn evade it constituting torture? And if an act that fits the description of torture is to be removed from constituting torture as it is “arising only from, inherent in or incidental to lawful sanctions,” then would this not provide a free pass to governments to claim that as it is imposed by the country’s judicial system, which in that country is a lawful sanction, making it not an act of torture?

If this argument is to be upheld, then we are facing a grey area where countries are provided the green light to act as they please, and bring it under the loophole of claiming as a lawful sanction. The best way to address this would be to base flogging as a violation of international law under jus cogens. Torture is a violation of jus cogens, and any act that is in violation of it even mandated by any treaty would be invalidated and will be a violation of international law. However cases such as Jones V Saudi Arabia case does not shed positive light as it provides that state immunity takes precedence over torture or any claim in international law which is considered to be jus cogens.

Obligations on Parties to the Convention Against Torture

Article 2 of the Convention Against Torture states, “Each State Party shall take effective legislative, administrative, judicial or other measures to prevent acts of torture in any territory under its jurisdiction,” which in turn creates the obligation on Saudi Arabia to remove punishments such as flogging from the list of lawful sanctions by their judiciary. The Article further elaborates that “No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat or war, internal political instability or any other public emergency, may be invoked as a justification of torture.”

Article 4 (1) also provides that “Each State Party shall ensure that all acts of torture are offences under its criminal law,” which creates an ironic situation for Saudi Arabia where there criminal law sanctions such as flogging is an act of torture which needs to be categorized as offences under criminal law.

Flogging as a Punishment in Sri Lanka

In the Penal Code of Sri Lanka, whipping used to be a punishment.  However this has been repealed through Section 3 of the Corporal PunishmentAct No. 23 of 2005 which states “Wherever in any written law, there is included as part of a sentence of whipping, such law shall from and after the date of the coming into operation of this Act, be deemed to be amended by the omission therefrom of such part of such sentence as relates to whipping ”

Further, Children and Young Persons Ordinance Section 29 (1) provides, “Where a child or young person who is a male is found guilty by any court of any offence, the court may, if it is for any reason of opinion that the case is one in which corporal punishment should be inflicted, make order that the child or young person shall receive not more than six strokes with a light cane or rattan,- such strokes to be inflicted in the presence of the court and, if the parent of the child or young person desires to be present, in his presence.” This punishment is no longer practiced by the Sri Lankan judiciary.

Previously, whipping was allowed under the Corporal Punishment Ordinance No. 16 of 1889. According to Section 7 of the Act, the following offences were punishable by whipping:

  • Voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons or means, (as defined in Section 315 of Penal Code)
  • Voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means (as defined in Section 317 of Code)
  • Rape and attempting to commit same (as defined in Section 363 of Code)
  • Unnatural offences (as defined in Section 365 of Code)
  • Theft after preparation for causing death or hurt (as defined in Section 371 of Code)
  • Extortion by threat (as defined in Section 377 of Code)
  • Putting a person in fear of accusation in order to commit extortion (as defined in Section 381 of Code)
  • Robbery (as defined in Section 379 of Code)
  • Attempting to commit, robbery (as defined in Section 381 of Code)
  • Robbery with attempt to cause death or grievous hurt (as defined in Section 383 of Code)
  • Attempting to commit robbery when armed with deadly weapon (as defined in Section 384 of Code)
  • Lurking house-trespass or house offenders above the age of sixteen breaking in order to committing of any offence punishable with whipping, (as defined in Section 429 and 431)
  • Lurking house-trespass by night or house-breaking by night, in order to commit any offence punishable with whipping under this section (as defined in Section 439 and 432 of Code)

These provisions are only applicable with respect to a male offender above the age of 16 years (Section 7(2) of Corporal Punishment Ordinance). This Act was repealed by the Corporal Punishment (Repeal) Act No. 23 of 2005.

Badawi and the 950 Remaining Lashes

Raif Badawi received his first 50 lashes 9th January, 2015, and has a remaining 950 lashes of his punishment which is expected to be administered on him in 19 sessions. However following the first execution of his punishment he has been considered as  not been medically fit to undergo the next session of 50 lashes, and the punishment has since been postponed for a third time this week. The global community calls for his pardon, and his release from charges that are viewed a violation of his freedom of expression. How does one justify such inhuman treatment?

“On arrival visa to Sri Lanka: NO MORE!”

27 Friday May 2011

Posted by vositha in current updates

≈ 6 Comments

Tags

Bhutan, Immigration, on arrival visa, Sri Lanka, Thai visa, visa

Twitter informs me that the on arrival visa facility that Sri Lanka was famous of will be soon scrapped off. From August onwards those who wish to come to Lanka land need visa. Yes you do!

What do I think of it? Well call me vicious, but I think it was long due. Every time I am standing in a queue trying to get my visa papers sorted I wonder why Sri Lankan immigration was being ever too nice when the other countries are all giving us shit. Well I mean I am happy that Sri Lanka is nice about it, but then again, the mere fact the other countries look upon us like retards who are waiting to hop into their country for good, on being given the chance to step in pisses me off! ( then again, our folk are also responsible for such assumptions, doing exactly what is assumed of them, and then causing difficulties for those unlike them! Sigh, of late I have come to realise that the world is full of idiots, and me filling in on that list as well on a random basis)

Anyhow the last few travels to Thailand and India, and my experience being stuck in the Thai Embassy till end of day taking shit from the visa officers thanks to a stupid travel agent who had messed up my visa forms, followed by the new Indian visa regulations which required me to apply for another entry visa while in Bhutan has made me realize that one should never give away something too easily when you are being deprived of it.

So the conclusion for the day: If they give you shit, do give them shit! (damn I am turning a super ass bitch, and seem to be getting quite good at it)

Anyhow on a different note, have a happy day folks, and for those who were awaiting with great anticipation the victory parades, my wish does not seem to be of any help! I sorry for you all, but it does seem like it is going to rain! Yea RAIN! (another parade haunted by rain, is it just me, or does not the weather seem to like these parades ah?)

The stance on the visas seems to have changed since I posted this. Hence the quotes from morning, and then the latest, so that one reading may form their own opinion on the matter!

Morning quote from

http://www.adaderana.lk/news.php?nid=13405&utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=Bambuwa

“Sri Lanka on Thursday withdrew the on-arrival free visa facility for Indian tourists. It means that Indians planning a trip to Sri Lanka after August should apply for their visas online for a fee or visit Lankan missions with an application. The new system will be implemented within 80 days, WA Chulananda Perera, Immigration and Emigration Controller General, told the Hindustan Times.

Besides Indian tourists, visitors from 78 other countries will be impacted by the decision.

“Only tourists from Singapore and Maldives, countries which gives on-arrival visas to Lankans, will continue to get the reciprocal facility,’’ Perera added.”

The afternoon quote from http://www.adaderana.lk/news.php?nid=13412

“Foreign media reports stating that Sri Lanka had scrapped the on-arrival visa system for Indian tourists entering the country were denied by the Immigration and Emigration Controller General, WA Chulananda Perera who stated that he had been misquoted.

Speaking to Ada Derana today (May 27) Mr. Perera said that he had made no statement to the Indian Newspaper regarding Indian on-arrival visas and had only spoken about the new online electronic visa system to be implemented by Sri Lanka.”

So what do you make out of this? That on implementing the online visa system, the on arrival visa facility expires? (at least that is what I seem to gather from it)


Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • May 2022
  • June 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • April 2019
  • June 2018
  • September 2017
  • June 2017
  • April 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • November 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • March 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • May 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010

Categories

  • #WomenAtWork
  • #YouthForChange
  • ADP 2015
  • Autism Awareness
  • Climate Change
  • COP18 Doha
  • COP21
  • current updates
  • Development
  • Environment
  • Features
  • FfD3
  • Fiction
  • Finance
  • gender
  • Guest Bloggers
  • Handbook on Human Species
  • Novel
  • Paris Agreement
  • poetry or something of the sort.
  • Random Moments of Life
  • Relationships
  • SDGs
  • Sustainable Development
  • Uncategorized
  • UNFCCC

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,810 other subscribers

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Follow Following
    • Vositha's Blog
    • Join 137 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Vositha's Blog
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...